Automation And Integrations

Connecting Apps Through Integrations

See how built-in connections and connectors pass data between tools, what to check before linking two apps, and how to keep integrations safe and tidy.

On this page
  1. What an integration is
  2. Three common ways apps connect
  3. Questions to ask before connecting two tools
  4. Permissions and privacy
  5. Why integrations break
  6. Avoiding a tangle of connections
  7. Testing and documenting a connection
  8. Choosing the simplest option that works

What an integration is

An integration is a link that lets one tool send information to another, or read it from another, without you copying it by hand. A calendar that shows tasks from a task list, a form that adds a row to a spreadsheet, or a support tool that posts a message in a chat channel are all examples.

Behind the scenes, apps usually talk to each other through an interface the maker publishes for exactly that purpose, often called an API. You do not need to know how it works. What matters is that the link has a defined shape: certain kinds of information can move, in certain directions, when certain things happen.

Three common ways apps connect

Built-in integrations. Many tools offer a settings page where you can connect them to other popular tools by signing in and approving access. These are generally the simplest and most reliable option because both sides are designed with the link in mind. The trade-off is that you get only the options the maker built. If you need a slightly different behavior, you may be stuck.

Connector services. A separate service sits in the middle and links many tools to each other. You choose something that should start the process, then choose what should happen in response. This is more flexible than built-in options and works across tools whose makers never planned to work together. It also adds another account to manage, another place where permissions are stored, and often a usage limit or a recurring cost, which varies by service.

Import and export. The oldest method is still common. One tool exports a file, another imports it. This is manual or semi-manual, but it is predictable and easy to inspect. For a monthly report, it can be the right choice.

A fourth path, custom code against an API, suits teams with a developer and unusual needs. Most individuals and small teams never need it.

Questions to ask before connecting two tools

A short check beforehand prevents most integration headaches.

  • Which direction does the data flow? Some links are one-way: a new item in tool A creates an item in tool B, but changes in B do not travel back. Others are two-way. Two-way sync is convenient, yet it can create confusing situations when both sides change the same item.
  • What exactly is shared? Some connections pass only a title and a date. Others expose full contents, attachments, or contact details. Find out which.
  • When does it update? Some links work almost immediately. Others check on a schedule, such as every several minutes or hours, so changes can appear late.
  • Which fields line up? If one tool has a “status” with four options and the other has two, someone has to decide how they map to each other. Mismatches cause odd results.
  • What happens to old items? Most integrations only handle new activity from the moment you turn them on. Existing records often need a separate one-time import.

Permissions and privacy

Every integration works by granting one tool some access to another. When you click “allow,” you are usually giving the connecting tool the ability to read, and sometimes change, your data. Take a moment to read what is being requested. Understanding app permissions helps you spot requests that go beyond what the link needs, such as full read and write access to an entire account when you only wanted to post a message.

Some good habits:

  • Approve the narrowest access that does the job.
  • Connect using an account that has only the access it needs, rather than your own administrator login.
  • Keep a list of which connections exist so you can remove them later.
  • Turn on two-factor authentication on the accounts involved, since a connection is only as safe as the accounts at each end.
  • Be especially careful with links that carry customer data, because the data now lives in more than one place, and each place has its own privacy and retention rules.

When someone leaves your team, their personal connections can linger. Reviewing integrations should be part of access offboarding, since a link authorized by a former colleague may keep running under their name.

Why integrations break

Integrations tend to fail for ordinary reasons rather than dramatic ones:

  • An expired sign-in or changed password silently cuts the link.
  • A tool changes how it shares data, and the connection no longer understands it.
  • A field is renamed or deleted on one side.
  • A usage limit is reached, so some updates are skipped.
  • The person who set it up leaves, and their account is closed.

Because the link usually fails quietly, you may not notice until something is missing. A simple safeguard is to check, now and then, that a recent item really did appear on the other side. For anything important, ask the tool whether it can send a notice when a connection fails. If the data matters, keep a plan for catching errors; the question of monitoring and alerts is a big part of what happens when automation goes wrong.

Avoiding a tangle of connections

It is easy to connect everything to everything. Each link feels harmless, but together they form a web that is hard to understand, and a change in one tool can ripple outward in ways nobody predicted. Several habits keep things manageable.

Pick one tool as the main home for each kind of information, sometimes called the source of truth. If customer details live in one place, other tools should read from it rather than hold their own competing versions. Prefer fewer, simpler links over many clever ones. And ask whether you need the connection at all. Sometimes the problem is that you use too many overlapping tools, and the better fix is to reduce tool sprawl instead of wiring the extras together.

Testing and documenting a connection

When you set up a link, test it with a harmless sample before pointing it at real work. Create a test item, confirm it appears on the other side with the right details, then edit and delete it to see what happens. Write down in a sentence or two what the connection does, which accounts it uses and who to ask if it fails. That note will save someone, possibly you, a lot of time months later.

If you are thinking about changing tools, remember that integrations are part of what you may need to rebuild. Checking how a tool exports and shares data is also useful when judging vendor lock-in.

Choosing the simplest option that works

Start with a built-in integration if one exists. Move to a connector service if you need something the built-in option cannot do. Use import and export when the task is occasional. Whichever you choose, treat the link as a small piece of infrastructure: understood, documented and reviewed occasionally. Done well, an integration quietly removes copy-and-paste work. Done carelessly, it becomes one more thing that stops working without anyone noticing.

The complete guide to automation and integrations

A Beginner Guide to Automating Repetitive Work
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →